Chapter 10: Early Medieval Art in Western Europe

This Chapter contains the following:

Introduction to the Early Medieval Period in Western Europe

Permanence, Portability, and Power in the Northern Seas, c. 700-1200

The Vikings

The Anglo-Saxons

Carolingian Period

Ottonian Period

KEY TERMINOLOGY
  • interlace patterning
  • insular style
  • animal style
  • boss
  • gadrooning
  • Renovatio
  • spolia
  • Carolingian miniscule
  • westwork
  • refectory
  • alternate support system
Questions to consider:
  • What was found in the Sutton Hoo ship burial?  What does this tell you about this culture?  How similar is it to the Oseberg burial?
  • Think about pagan and Christian arts in this region.   Did the imagery change in the arts?  What sorts of influences do you see in the illuminated manuscripts?    
  • Think about both the manuscripts with interlace patterning and those which show classical influence in their compositions.
  • What do the Irish stone crosses signify?  What is the probable origin of the design elements in this stone carving?
  • What was the importance of metalwork in Early Western Medieval art?
  • Be sure you can discuss how Charlemagne’s idea of a Renovatio uses specific examples from the Roman empire and the Early Christian and Byzantine periods.   What were his accomplishments?  What was the importance of books in this period?
  • What did the “three Ottos” take from the Carolingian period?  From the classical world? Be sure you understand the alternate support system used in the Ottonian Churches – it is important for later Romanesque buildings as well.
  • What contributions were made by Bishop Bernward?  Can you discuss the typology of the imagery of the Doors?
  • What sorts of ways is Christ portrayed during this period?

Introduction: The Early Medieval Period in Western Europe

This chapter covers a number of regions and political entities from roughly 500 – 1200 CE.  This includes powerful sea-going people from Scandinavia, monasteries and other communities based in the British Isles and the rise of the Carolingian and Ottonian kingdoms (who saw themselves as the heirs to the Roman Empire).  These cultures were in contact with one another and shared a visual vocabulary.

 

Map of the migration of peoples across Europe and Western Asia after the division of the Roman Empire at the end of the 4th c. CE. From World History Encyclopedia, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

 

Permanence, Portability, and Power in the Northern Seas, c. 700–1200

This article considers how powerful warrior kings as well as devoted followers of Christ demonstrated their political and holy power with both permanent and portable visual objects in the northern seas of Europe.
Side B of the Jelling stone, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side B with Great Beast motif (photo: Casiopeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: diagram of side B showing Great Beast motif

An enormous, unrefined slab of stone decorated with carvings that were once brightly painted remains in Jelling, Denmark to this day. Erected around 965 by King Harald Bluetooth, the stone was placed beside an earlier monument, sponsored by Harald’s father, Gorm, to honor his wife, Thyra. King Bluetooth’s stone is decorated with carvings of ancient runes that acknowledge his parentage and tie him to the centuries-old practice of erecting such monuments throughout the landscape. One side of the stone depicts a mythical creature, known as the “Great Beast,” demonstrating Harald’s ability to harness pre-Christian sources of power. The tenth-century king had recently united Denmark and Norway with his military might, and he wanted to add a new layer to this visualization of his increasing power: an image of the crucified Christ (shown below).

Map with areas of the northern seas (underlying map © Google)
Map with areas of the northern seas (underlying map © Google)

The world that Harald Bluetooth inhabited was characterized by cultural exchange, mainly conducted along the waterways of the Northern Seas. From Scandinavia to the west of Ireland, expert shipbuilders crafted vessels that were able to sail all the way across the Atlantic Ocean. [1] But Harald’s world was also filled with conflict. Local leaders and regional kings were constantly vying for position, and consolidating power where they could. Religious practices were also in flux, as Christian practices began to intersect with pre-Christian traditions and beliefs in the tenth century.

 

Jelling stone with traits of the Mammen style, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side A showing Christ bound in tendrils (photo: Caiospeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: side A with reconstruction of original polychromy (National Museum of Denmark)

Side A of the Jelling stone, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side A showing Christ bound in tendrils (photo: Casiopeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: side A with reconstruction of original polychromy (National Museum of Denmark)

For a leader in such times, colorful, decorated standing stones served to permanently and publicly declare his ability to harness all sorts of power, both ancestral and contemporary, pre-Christian and Christian. The king and his entourage would also parade portable symbols of wealth and finery throughout the countryside. We can imagine Harald and his entourage wearing fine silver brooches, finger rings, and arm bands, and carrying elaborately decorated weaponry. Even their horses would have been adorned with precious metal fittings.

This chapter considers how powerful warrior kings like Harald Bluetooth, as well as devoted followers of Christ, demonstrated their political and holy power with both permanent and portable visual objects. This period in European history (c. 700–1200) includes so many diverse cultures—Angles, Saxons, Danes, Jutes, and more—that it is challenging to give it an appropriately inclusive name. Many of the modern labels used to classify these cultures are inaccurate and even carry negative associations. The phrase “Anglo-Saxon,” for example, has a long history of misuse, especially in white supremacist contexts, as Dr. Mary Rambaran-Olm discusses in her essay “Misnaming the Medieval: Rejecting Anglo-Saxon Studies.” [2] In an effort to mitigate the damage caused by this language, I have avoided the terms “Anglo-Saxon” and “Viking” as ethnic descriptors.

What is most important to understand about the term “Viking” is that it describes an activity, a way of life, not an ethnicity. The phrase “the Viking Age,” as it is used here on Smarthistory, makes sense because, in the years between about 700 and 1200 of the common era, Scandinavians went viking—seafaring, adventuring, raiding. Throughout the Northern Seas and beyond, they came into contact with others whose kings erected colorful standing stones, and even crosses, and they saw portable signs of power: valuable, golden objects, belonging to both kings and to the Church. Ultimately, most modern terminology about this time in Europe is flawed, but the surviving visual objects tell a rich story about the people and their beliefs. Read on to learn how such very different works of art—enormous, immovable stone sculptures and small-scale, mobile treasures—conveyed many forms of power. For everyone from warrior kings to devout holy figures, spheres of influence and control could be pinpointed, advertised, and extended by means of visual imagery.

Prehistoric Megaliths and Ancient Treasures

Stonehenge, Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, England, c. 2550–1600 B.C.E., circle 97 feet in diameter, trilithons: 24 feet high (photo: Maedin Tureaud, CC BY-SA 3.0)
Stonehenge, Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, England, c. 2550–1600 B.C.E., circle 97 feet in diameter, trilithons: 24 feet high (photo: Maedin Tureaud, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The practice of erecting large standing stones (megaliths) in the Northern Seas region began long before 700 C.E. Prehistoric stone circles like Stonehenge still survive throughout the landscape, and scholars believe that these imposing constructions were built on land that was considered sacred. The mystical powers circulating at such locations would extend beyond the stones themselves, available for both kings and holy men to harness for worldly purposes. Early medieval viewers must have sensed the eternal presence of their ancestral traditions in these enormous stones.

Poulnabrone Dolmen, c. 4200–2900 B.C.E., The Burren, County Clare, Ireland (photo: Sabine Holzmann, CC BY-SA 3.0)
Poulnabrone Dolmen, c. 4200–2900 B.C.E., The Burren, County Clare, Ireland (photo: Sabine Holzmann, CC BY-SA 3.0)

For example, in Ireland, huge dolmens marked sacred places and may have been associated with burial and the veil between the living and the dead.

Ring of Brogdar, Neolithic period, Ornkey, Scotland, 104 meters in diameter (photo: Accuruss, CC BY-SA 4.0)
Ring of Brogdar, Neolithic period, Ornkey, Scotland, 104 meters in diameter (photo: Accuruss, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Off the coast of Scotland, the Ring of Brodgar adorned the landscape near the village at Skara Brae in the Orkney archipelago, and megalithic stone circles have also been found throughout Ireland, England, Wales, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.

Golden lunula and two gold discs (from the Coggalbeg hoard), c. 2300–2000 B.C.E., gold, Coggalbeg, County Roscommon, Ireland (National Museum of Ireland, Archaeology)

Precious golden and silver objects had also been crafted throughout the region for millennia, as demonstrated by such finds as the Coggalbeg and Broighter Hoards. Since at least the Neolithic era, evidence shows that powerful people across the Northern Seas were adorning themselves with portable signs of their wealth and status. Over many centuries, they perfected the crafts of metalworking, inlay, and cloisonné enameling, and they created stunning jewelry, weapons, chalices, and reliquaries. In addition to these valuable personal items, the power of words—even the sacred Christian Word—was portable, in the form of illuminated manuscripts.

Permanence: Monumental Crosses and Rune Stones

Muiredach's High Cross (South Cross), former Monastery of Monasterboice (Mainistir Bhuithe), County Louth, Ireland, sandstone, 5.2 m high (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Muiredach’s High Cross (South Cross), former Monastery of Monasterboice (Mainistir Bhuithe), County Louth, Ireland, sandstone, 5.2 m high (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The introduction of Christian practices into the region—first in Ireland around the 5th century—affected the form, style, and function of megalithic sculpture. In England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, sculptors began to erect monumental ringed crosses carved with intricate designs and figural imagery. By the 10th century, as Christianity began to take hold in Scandinavia, standing stones were decorated with interlace designs and symbols depicting pre-Christian and Christian elements side by side. All of these stone sculptures were originally painted in bright colors, to draw attention to the imagery and pick out details in the designs.

 

Muiredach's High Cross (South Cross), former Monastery of Monasterboice (Mainistir Bhuithe), County Louth, Ireland, sandstone, 5.2 m high (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Detail of the Crucifixion. Muiredach’s High Cross (South Cross), former Monastery of Monasterboice (Mainistir Bhuithe), County Louth, Ireland, sandstone, 5.2 m high (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The ringed crosses were emphatically Christian monuments. Scholars believe that wooden crosses were built first, at least in Ireland, possibly as early as 600 C.E. Those wooden structures were eventually replaced by carved stone crosses, hundreds of which still remain in their original locations. The crosses in Ireland are perhaps the best known, but there are similar monuments from the same time period surviving in England, Scotland, and Wales.

 

Left: Cross of the Scriptures, Clonmacnoise monastery, founded 544 by St Ciarán, County Offaly (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0); right: detail of a East face base panel (inscription: "a prayer for Colman who erected this cross for King Flann"), original created in 9th C. (replica placed in the location of the original), Clonmacnoise (Cluain Mhic Nóis), Co. Offaly (photo: Keith Ewing, CC BY-NC 2.0)
Left: Cross of the Scriptures, 9th century, Clonmacnoise monastery, founded 544 by St Ciarán, County Offaly (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0); right: detail of an east face base panel showing an image of a king and a representative of the church collaborating (inscription: “a prayer for Colman who erected this cross for King Flann”), original created in 9th c. (replica placed in the location of the original), Clonmacnoise, County Offaly (photo: Keith Ewing, CC BY-NC 2.0) 

Most of the crosses are carved with scenes from the Bible and the Lives of the Saints, as well as intricate geometric designs. They were erected to mark sacred places in the landscape, and some may have included visual reinforcements for real-world power structures. Visible from a great distance, the crosses could indicate the location of a sacred monastery and the Christian ownership of the land, while the relief decorations could signal earthly power structures. At Clonmacnoise, for example, an image of a king and a representative of the church (identified by their costumes) collaborating emphasizes the interconnectedness of the civic and religious realms. [3]

 

Even more common are runestones that only feature inscriptions. For example, Runestone Sö 130 from Södermanland County, Sweden, has only bands of runic text. These commemorate a man who died in what would be modern-day Russia.
A “Rune Stone” that only features a written inscriptions, Runestone Sö 130 from Södermanland County, Sweden (photo: Berig, CC BY-SA 3.0)

In Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, large stones carved with geometric designs and runic letters appear around the 10th century C.E. Taking their name from the runic letters inscribed into the stones, these “Rune Stones” retained the natural shape of the rock, but their surfaces were decorated with brightly painted relief decorations. Some of the stones also include explicitly Christian imagery, such as King Harald Bluetooth’s monument (described above).

 

church and detail carving urnes
Left: the Urnes Stave Church with a view toward the north portal (photo: Evelina Ander, CC BY-NC 2.0); right: detail from the Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Bjørn Erik Pedersen, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Despite the popularity of large stone monuments, surviving stone buildings are less common throughout the region. Wood appears to have been a more popular material for church building, and it is likely that many early wooden structures simply did not survive. In Scandinavia, wooden Stave Churches have been dated to the 12th century, and many archaeological excavations have included evidence of postholes for wooden structures.

 

Skellig Michael monastery (Ireland), 6th–13th centuries (most of the stone construction dates to 8th–11th centuries)
Skellig Michael monastery (Ireland), 6th–13th centuries (most of the stone construction dates to 8th–11th centuries) (photo: Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Small stone buildings survive in some locations, and larger, more complex stone buildings were constructed in the later Middle Ages. On the remote island of Skellig Michael, for instance, early medieval stone huts tell the story of isolated hermits and monks, religious people who left society to pray, study, and meditate.

 Portability: Power in Motion

Merovingian (Frankish) Looped Fibulae, mid-6th century, silver gilt worked in filigree with inlaid garnet and other stones (Musée des Antiquities Nationales, Saint-Germain-en-Laye)
Merovingian (Frankish) Looped Fibulae, mid-6th century, silver gilt worked in filigree with inlaid garnet and other stones (Musée des Antiquities Nationales, Saint-Germain-en-Laye)

While permanent stone monuments were being erected to mark sacred and political territories, small-scale, precious objects were also circulating throughout the region. These valuable items could easily demonstrate their owners’ wealth and prominence, and that display of status could act as reminder of dominance and control, both for sacred leaders and for warrior kings.

In the Northern Seas region and beyond, fibulae and other types of brooches had been status symbols for centuries. Made from precious metals like gold and silver and adorned with imported gemstones like garnets, these personal items were both materially valuable and socially significant.

 

Left: Small selection of objects from the Viking-age Galloway Hoard, which includes more than 100 objects made in gold, silver, crystal, glass, stone, and earthen objects, discovered in the historical county of Kirkcudbrightshire in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland in 2014 (National Museum of Scotland, CC BY-SA 4.0); right: Cuff from the Staffordshire Hoard, which includes more than 4,500 items a and metal fragments, found near the village of Hammerwich, near Lichfield, in Staffordshire, England in 2009 Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, photo: Daniel Buxton, CC BY 2.0)
Left: Small selection of objects from the Viking-age Galloway Hoard, which includes more than 100 objects made in gold, silver, crystal, glass, stone, and earthen objects, discovered in the historical county of Kirkcudbrightshire in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland in 2014 (National Museum of Scotland, CC BY-SA 4.0); right: Cuff from the Staffordshire Hoard, which includes more than 4,500 items a and metal fragments, found near the village of Hammerwich, near Lichfield, in Staffordshire, England in 2009, c. 600–900 C .E. (Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, photo: Daniel Buxton, CC BY 2.0)

Most of what modern scholars have learned about these precious objects comes from the field of archaeology. Frequently, a collection of precious items is found buried together in what’s known as a hoard, or they might be found in an elite person’s burial. Many of these hoards appear to have been buried quickly, in times of crisis, and it is difficult to determine precisely when or why they were placed in the ground. It is also rare to be able to associate a collection of objects with specific owners or craftspeople. What we can say with certainty about these hoards of precious objects, though, is that they signify both wealth and status. The fact that such valuable items were rapidly collected and hidden underground suggests conflict, and reinforces the idea that the items contained in the hoard were the target of an attack, an effort to confiscate wealth and transfer both its economic and its symbolic power. Hoards continue to be unearthed, including these discovered within the last few decades, such as the Staffordshire Hoard and the Galloway Hoard.

 

Photo of the excavation of the Sutton Hoo ship burial, by Barbara Wagstaff, 1939. © 2019 The Trustees of the British Museum
Photo of the excavation of the Sutton Hoo ship burial, by Barbara Wagstaff, 1939 (© 2019 The Trustees of the British Museum)

Portable precious items have also been recovered as grave goods in elite burials, another example of pre-Christian and Christian practices appearing alongside one another in the early medieval Northern Seas. The maritime culture in the area meant that powerful rulers—both male and female—were often buried with their ships.

 

The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, iron and tinned copper alloy helmet, consisting of many pieces of iron, now built into a reconstruction, 31.8 x 21.5 cm (as restored) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, iron and tinned copper alloy helmet, consisting of many pieces of iron, now built into a reconstruction, 31.8 x 21.5 cm (as restored) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

These ship burials compound the idea of portable power by combining a person’s mortal remains with the precious items that articulated their earthly status or military strength. Their status travels with them into the afterlife, as demonstrated by their brooches, necklaces, bracelets, decorated weaponry, and elaborate helmets.

The Ardagh Chalice, c. 8th century, silver, gilt copper, gold filigree, gold, gilt bronze, silver, polychrome glass, amber, rock crystal, 18 cm high, 19.5 cm in diameter at the rim, found in a hoard in the ringfort of Reerasta, near Ardagh, County Limerick, Ireland (National Museum of Ireland)

In addition to secular objects like brooches and helmets, artists in this period made elaborately decorated precious items for use in Christian rites and rituals. Such objects include processional crosses, patens and chalices to celebrate the mass, as well as sacred reliquaries. A reliquary is a precious container for the holy relic of a saint. Priests—and sometimes kings—would carry these golden and gem-encrusted objects in church processions or through the town on a holy day, and sacred energy was believed to emanate from the object, blessing the people and reinforcing either sacred or secular leadership, sometimes both.

 

Máel Ísú mac Bratáin Uí Echach, The Cross of Cong (commissiond by Toirrdelbach Ua Conchobair king of Connacht and high king of Ireland, 1123, oak core within cast bronze, rock crystal, gold filigree, gilding, silver sheeting, niello and silver inlay, glass, and enamel, 76 x 48 x 3.5 cm (National Museum of Ireland)
The Cross of Cong (commissioned by Toirrdelbach Ua Conchobair king of Connacht and high king of Ireland), 1123, oak core within cast bronze, rock crystal, gold filigree, gilding, silver sheeting, niello and silver inlay, glass, and enamel, 76 x 48 x 3.5 cm (National Museum of Ireland; photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-2.0)

In 1123, for example, the Irish Cross of Cong was carried in procession to demonstrate king Toirrdelbach Ua Conchobair’s status and to reinforce his authority. The gold and enamel cross was known to contain a holy relic—a sliver of the True Cross (the cross Jesus was crucified on). The stunning exterior of the reliquary cross would have enhanced the aura of the relic within, and carrying it in procession would have been like a performance of power for the king and the church leaders.

 

Saint Patrick's Bell and Shrine; bell: 8th–9th century C.E., iron; shrine: c. 1100 C.E., copper-alloy box, silver gilt, gold, silver, gilt-copper, rock crystal, colored stones, 26.7 x 15.5 cm (National Museum of Ireland, Dublin)
Saint Patrick’s Bell and Shrine; bell: 8th–9th century C.E., iron; shrine: c. 1100 C.E., copper-alloy box, silver gilt, gold, silver, gilt-copper, rock crystal, colored stones, 26.7 x 15.5 cm (National Museum of Ireland, Dublin)

The fine, elaborately decorated exteriors of reliquaries showed the community that the Church had valuable resources and also that the holy leaders had the power to contain the sacred energy itself, which came in the form of the relic within. Another wonderful early medieval Irish reliquary adds a dimension of imagined sound to the picture. Enclosed in a decorated shrine, Saint Patrick’s bell remains silenced, but the outer form of the reliquary reminds viewers that the bell is meant to ring, and that the related sacred power has the potential to travel great distances via sound waves.

The Lindisfarne Gospels, c. 700, parchment, 36.5 x 27.5 cm (The British Library)

The Lindisfarne Gospels, c. 700, parchment, 36.5 x 27.5 cm (The British Library)

The power of books

Books were another type of sacred, portable item that conveyed both holy and royal power. Christian books were especially precious, both because the Bible specifically proclaims that its words contain holy power and because making manuscripts was a costly and labor-intensive process. Some books were encased in precious reliquaries, while others simply conveyed power by their very existence.

 

Chi Rho page, Book of Kells, c. 800, 340 vellum folios, 33.0 x 25.5 cm each (edges trimmed and gilded in the 19th century), MS 58 (Trinity College Library, Dublin)
Chi Rho page, Book of Kells, c. 800, 340 vellum folios, 33.0 x 25.5 cm each (edges trimmed and gilded in the 19th century), MS 58 (Trinity College Library, Dublin)

The power of books in the early medieval period is perhaps best illustrated by the Book of Kells (c. 800 C.E.). Now in Dublin, the manuscript is notorious for its travels. In fact, scholars have spent decades trying to trace its journey from Iona in Scotland to Kells in Ireland. Over the centuries, the book has only increased its powerful aura, becoming a symbol of ethnicity and Irish nationalism in addition to a sacred text.

The cultures that thrived throughout the Northern Seas region in the early medieval period had long histories of constructing both massive stone monuments and painstakingly crafted objects made from precious materials. Brightly painted ringed crosses and rune stones alike stood throughout the landscapes of Ireland, England, Scotland, Wales, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in this period, emphasizing the connections between spheres of political and religious control. As people moved through the countryside and along the many waterways, they wore, wielded, and displayed precious items whose mystical auras generated zones of power. Modern scholars have discovered mysteriously buried hoards and elite grave goods throughout the area, and elegant illuminated manuscripts, such as the Book of Kells, continue to announce the artistic power of these cultures to this day.

Source: Dr. Maggie M. Williams, “Permanence, Portability, and Power in the Northern Seas, c. 700–1200,” in Reframing Art History, Smarthistory, January 24, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/permanence-portability-power-northern-seas/.

Terms to know and questions to guide your reading

Chalice
Cloisonné enameling
Dolmen
Fibula (pl. fibulae)
High Cross
Hoard
Illuminated manuscript
Interlace
Megalith
Paten
Relic
Reliquary
Rune Stones
Stave churches
Viking Age
  • How do works of art communicate power for the people who make, view, use, or wear them?
  • What kinds of power did early medieval objects signify? Political? Religious? Social? Economic?
  • What kind of power does a permanent, monumental structure convey? What about a materially valuable object that can be worn, carried, or displayed?

 

The Vikings

 

Art of the Viking Age

Animal head post found in burial mound near Tønsberg, Oseberg style (The Museum of Cultural History in Oslo; photo: Kirsten Helgeland, (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Animal head post found in burial mound near Tønsberg (Oseberg ship burial), 9th century, Oseberg style, wood and paint (no longer existing) (The Museum of Cultural History in Oslo; photo: Kirsten Helgeland, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Modern representations of the Vikings can be fun, but are often limited to sensationalized depictions of violent, raiding warriors. In reality, Vikings were a small group of a larger community of people called the Norse (or Norsemen). Few of these Norsemen raided, and many more were merchants, farmers, and craftsmen. Political and mercenary work were among their enterprises, but exploration, colonization, and mercantilism also fueled their expeditions.

Areas of early Vikings, with Lindisfarne noted (underlying map © Google)

Areas of early Vikings (underlying map © Google)

What initiated the Viking Age? Scholars typically identify the Viking raid of the wealthy monastery on the island of Lindisfarne in 793 (off the coast of England) as its starting point.  During the Viking Age, which lasted from the late 8th century through the 11th century, people from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden employed their maritime skills to journey around the globe. In addition to western Europe, they traveled to Byzantium, West Asia, China, Russia, Eastern Europe, Northern Africa, Greenland, and even North America. Interacting with many cultures and settling in many geographic regions, the Norse were more cosmopolitan than they receive credit for.

 

Viking Voyages
Map of Viking Voyages, Wikipedia, Viking Age. Map licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

The Norse visual world

The visual world was of great importance to the Norse. Significant resources were devoted to the creation of astonishing objects and the acquisition of foreign goods (through plunder and trade alike), and because of their highly mobile endeavors, Norse-made and Norse-influenced objects have been found across a wide geographic expanse.

An array of sophisticated, meticulously crafted objects survive. Fine imported materials were used, but local materials were also expertly handled by highly skilled craftspeople. Woodworking, for example, was an essential skill, and detailed wood carvings have been uncovered and restored. This material is susceptible to rot and fire, and so we can conclude that what survives today is a small fraction of the woodwork that once existed.

Objects made from more tenacious materials—like metal and stone—comprise the majority of what art historians have left to examine. Metal jewelry, storage vessels, and other utilitarian objects have been uncovered from burials and hoards. Ivory and bone carvings have also been found, as have a limited number of precious textiles and stone carvings.

The six Viking styles

The styles of Viking Art

Many objects served practical and symbolic purposes and their complex decorative patterns can be a challenge to untangle. Highly-stylized motifs weave around and flow into one another, so that following a single form from one end to the other can be difficult—if there are end points at all. Imagery was created to communicate  ideas about social relations, religious beliefs, and to recall a mythic past. Although many objects served pagan intentions, Christian themes began to intermingle with them as new ideas filtered into the region. Viking art is visually distinct from contemporaneous cultures (as traded objects and integrated customs demonstrate), and represents a unique way of thinking about the world.

Various beasts are carved into the Oseberg ship’s stern: a ribbon-animal (in blue, also called a streaming-animal); gripping-beasts rendered with humanoid heads (in red); and more ambiguous forms that echo the bodies of creatures seen at the prow (in green). Oseberg oak longship and detail of prow with ribbon-animal and gripping-beast motifs, 9th century, found in burial mound near Tønsberg (Viking ship museum, Oslo; photo: Chad K, CC BY 2.0)

Various beasts are carved into the Oseberg ship’s stern: a ribbon-animal (in blue, also called a streaming-animal); gripping-beasts rendered with humanoid heads (in red); and more ambiguous forms that echo the bodies of creatures seen at the prow (in green). Oseberg oak longship and detail of prow with ribbon-animal and gripping-beast motifs, 9th century, found in burial mound near Tønsberg (Viking ship museum, Oslo; photo: Chad K, CC BY 2.0)

The animal motifs that frequently embellished objects are actually a continuation of artistic traditions from previous periods. Two were particularly widespread: the “ribbon-animal” and the “gripping beast.” We see both of these on the stern of the Oseberg longship.

The ribbon-animal was typically pictured as a highly abstracted creature with an elongated body and simplified features, appearing individually and in pairs. In contrast, the gripping beast—a fantastical creature with clearly defined limbs—was anchored to the borders of designs and surrounding creatures. Other animal motifs developed throughout the period, and human figures were also present. These elements, which are thought to have had particular assigned meanings, are central to the categorization of Viking Age art styles.

The Viking Art styles are:

Oseberg c. 775/800–875 C.E.
Borre c. 850–975 C.E.
Jellinge c. 900–975 C.E.
Mammen c. 960s–1000/1025 C.E.
Ringerike c. 990–1050 C.E.
Urnes c. 1050–1125 C.E.

Oseberg style

The Oseberg style was popular throughout mainland Scandinavia. Some of the most remarkable wood carving from the Viking Age was created in this style. A spectacular oak longship—found within the burial mound from which the style’s name was derived—is one of the most studied works of the period. Featuring carvings of the ribbon-animal and gripping-beast motifs in fluid combinations on its prow, it served as an elite funerary vessel for two women.

Oseberg ship and detail of prow

Oseberg oak longship and detail of prow, 9th century, found in burial mound near Tønsberg (Viking ship museum, Oslo; left photo: Petter Ulleland, CC BY-SA 4.0 and right photo: mararie, CC BY-SA 2.0)

Bearded man, detail on the cart, before 800, wood, found in the Oseberg burial mound (Museum of Cultural History, photo: Helen Simonsson, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Bearded man, detail on the cart, before 800, wood, found in the Oseberg burial mound (Museum of Cultural History, photo: Helen Simonsson, CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Oseberg style shows a strong interplay between zoomorphic and geometric patterns that continues artistic traditions predating the Viking Age.

In Oseberg art, animal motifs—which included birds, human faces sometimes thought to be masks (such as we see on the Oseberg burial cart), and the gripping beast—appear short and stocky, nearly equal in size, have rounded eyes, and tendril-like limbs. These schematic figures are situated within fields that divide surfaces into clear segments and emphasize the balance and organization of images. With mixtures of high- and low-relief carvings flooding their surfaces in tightly interlacing ornament, very little background is visible.

The “Academician’s” animal head post from the Oseberg ship burial, the Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo

The “Academician’s” animal head post, 9th century, wood, found in burial mound near Tønsberg (Oseberg ship burial) (Museum of Cultural History, Oslo; photo: Kirsten Helgeland, CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Oseberg ship burial included carved wooden posts, decorated sleds, and an oak wagon that may have been made by master craftsmen from a nearby workshop. For example, the “Academician’s” animal head post is one of five wooden animal-headed posts found in the Oseberg ship burial. Although the purpose of these objects remain unclear, their detailed carvings demonstrate advanced woodworking skills.

Also included was a set of tapestries that, despite their poor condition, are believed to depict battle scenes and a religious procession. They illustrate many objects found in the grave, indicating that material goods were important for performing customs in life and in death.

Borre style

Overlapping with the Oseberg style is the Borre style, which was also popular on the mainland. However, unlike the Oseberg style, Borre artistic conventions spread to the British Isles and the Baltic region as the Norsemen traveled both East and West. Exchanges between local and foreign artistic customs can be seen on objects found in these areas (with less overt characteristics appearing in the British Isles and more emphatic characteristics appearing to the east of the Baltic Sea).

Silver disc brooch, Borre style, late 9th–10th century, silver, 7.8 cm in diameter, found in Gotland, Sweden (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

Animals with their tongues licking their backs, alternating with four human figures who face the object’s center, gripping unidentified protrusions from their necks. Silver disc brooch, Borre style, late 9th–10th century, silver, 7.8 cm in diameter, found in Gotland, Sweden (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

Animal with its head are backward licking its back (detail), silver disc brooch, Borre style, late 9th–10th century, silver, 7.8 cm in diameter, found in Gotland, Sweden (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

Side view: Animal licking its back (detail), silver disc brooch, Borre style, late 9th–10th century, silver, 7.8 cm in diameter, found in Gotland, Sweden (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

Borre objects swarm the viewer with décor. Forms are arranged in closed compositions with tight, knot-like interlacing that almost fully obscures the background. Animal motifs appear comparatively more naturalistic, with squat, relaxed bodies. Spirals are introduced to represent hip joints, and figures may be reduced to decorative heads or appear as fully in-the-round forms.

On a silver disc-brooch from Gotland, a series of animal and human figures protrude outward into space. In a motif rarely seen outside of this style, the animals’ heads are oriented backward, their tongues licking their backs. Alternating between them are four human figures who face the object’s center, gripping as of yet unidentified protrusions from their necks.

Gold spur from Verne Kloster in Norway (The Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo)

Gold spur from Verne Kloster in Norway, 10th century, Borre style, gold (The Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo)

The “ring chain” pattern, which combines ribbon shapes to create a continuous band, is another Borre style trend. It is seen on small metal objects, such as the gold spur from Verne Kloster, and seems to have influenced stone carving traditions on the Isle of Man and in northwest England. This gold spur allowed a rider to control the movements of a horse. Featuring granulation and filigree details, along with the “ring chain” pattern, it is far more complicated than what is normally found in the Borre style.

The silver Jelling cup, Jelling, Jutland, Denmark, 958/959 CE, National Museum of Denmark

Silver Cup, 958/959, Jellinge style, found in Jelling, Jutland, Denmark (National Museum of Denmark)

Jellinge style

Sitting chronologically between the Borre style and the soon-to-be-discussed Mammen style, the Jellinge style is a malleable one. It appears on a diverse body of objects and can share features with the previous and subsequent styles, leaving it difficult to define as a separate movement. It was named for a cast silver cup that was found in a royal burial mound in Jelling, Jutland, Denmark (an “e” was accidentally added to the style’s name in the nineteenth century). Despite this mishap, this unique spelling helps art historians differentiate the style from the place.

Silver Cup, 958/959, Jellinge style, found in Jelling, Jutland, Denmark (National Museum of Denmark)

Red annotations show the wrist/ankle segments. Silver Cup, 958/959, Jellinge style, found in Jelling, Jutland, Denmark (National Museum of Denmark)

We can see this style’s main motif around its belly: a set of interlacing creatures that form a row of fluid, S-shaped forms. Within their bodies are single rows of beading (dot-like metal forms) and their feet resemble mitts. Lappets, the protrusions that look like ponytails, extend from their heads, distinguishing them from creatures of the Borre style.

Compositions in this style open up and expand, with the backgrounds becoming more visible. The anatomy of animal and human figures is simpler, with bodies portrayed as solid masses defined by individual or double contour lines. Hip joints are represented by spirals, while ankles and wrists are defined by small, geometric segments like those seen on the Jellinge cup. Heads have round or almond-shaped eyes and lips are apt to curl, while ribbon-animals are more prominent and the gripping beast fades.

Grave slab, 10th century, from the cemetery beneath York Minster (Image courtesy of York Museums Trust :: https://yorkmuseumstrust.org.uk :: CC BY-SA 4.0)

Grave slab with Jellinge style elements, 10th century, gritstone, 26.8 x 37 cm, from the cemetery beneath York Minster (Image courtesy of York Museums Trust, CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Jellinge style expanded as far as the Volga Bulgars and the Lower Volga River, along the Caspian Sea. It influenced art in western Europe, where stone sculptures from York show its considerable influence. A 10-century grave slab from the cemetery beneath York Minster, for instance, integrates the Jellinge style ornament with the Anglican tradition of marking burials with recumbent monuments.

Axe from Mammen, 970–71 (National Museum of Denmark)

Mammen-style axe (side with a possible tree), 970–71, inlaid with silver, from Mammen (National Museum of Denmark)

Mammen style

Named for a ceremonial axe head found near the Danish village of Mammen, this innovative style was popularized as the “court” style of King Harald Bluetooth (King of Denmark and Norway who ruled from c. 958–986). Its compositions span elongated waves and terminate in loose tendrils. We also see foliate motifs that were borrowed from other European traditions. A few of the qualities associated with the Jellinge style are exaggerated in it, like geometric shapes that segment the wrists, ankles, and other body parts of animals.

Top: a bird with a prominent hip joint; bottom: a set of winding tendrils, possibly depicting a tree. Mammen axe head. Diagram from Mette, Iversen, Ulf Näsman, and Jens Vellev, Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid (1991)

Top: a bird with a prominent hip joint; bottom: a set of winding tendrils, possibly depicting a tree. Mammen axe head. Diagram from Mette, Iversen, Ulf Näsman, and Jens Vellev, Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid (1991).

This can be seen at the base of the bird’s neck on the Mammen axe, along with ornamental beading throughout its body. Its limbs and wings are represented as expanding coils. Some background is visible, with glimpses of the underlying surface peeking out from beneath lively, energetic designs.

Each side of the Mammen axe head is inlaid with silver: on one side, a set of winding tendrils; and, on the other, a fabulous bird loops through even more tendrils and has a prominent spiral hip joint. Axes were very important to the Norsemen, who used them for domestic purposes and in battle, but the inlays of the Mammen axe indicate that it was a ceremonial object.

Jelling stone with traits of the Mammen style, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side B with Great Beast motif (photo: Caiospeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: diagram of side B showing Great Beast motif

Jelling stone with traits of the Mammen style, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side B with Great Beast motif (photo: Casiopeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: diagram of side B showing Great Beast motif

Often discussed are the runestones at Jelling (in Denmark), which feature traits of the Mammen style. It is in this style that a magnificent motif emerges: the Great Beast. We can see it on one side of the Jelling Stone, standing above a runic inscription that references his conquest of Norway and the religious conversion of Denmark.

The Great Beast is an amalgamation of several animals; it has features that appear similar to horns or antlers protruding from its head, and what appears to be a mane falling from its long neck. Its feet are segmented with claws, and in some representations—like the greater Jelling stone—serpents may wind around its body to create a dynamic interplay between the two motifs. The creature has been interpreted as a symbol of power.

Jelling stone with traits of the Mammen style, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side A showing Christ bound in tendrils (photo: Caiospeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: side A with reconstruction of original polychromy (National Museum of Denmark)

Jelling stone with traits of the Mammen style, 970 and circa 986, raised by King Bluetooth. Left: side A showing Christ bound in tendrils (photo: Casiopeia, CC BY-SA 2.0); right: side A with reconstruction of original polychromy (National Museum of Denmark)

Carved with runic inscriptions, these monumental stones were raised by King Bluetooth in memory of his deceased parents. As a Christian convert, Bluetooth was responsible for Denmark’s increasing acceptance and adoption of the religion. He had one side of the larger stone depict Christ bound in tendrils that end in pronounced foliates (leaf forms). With an inscription surrounded by serpentine ornament on its third side (not illustrated), this object is exceptionally detailed for a runestone.

A replica of the Cammin Casket (also called the Cammin shrine), a masterwork of Viking Age art, c. 1000, found in Kamen Pomorski, Poland. The original disappeared durign WWII (Hamburg Archaeological Museum)

A replica of the Cammin Casket (also called the Cammin shrine), a masterwork of Viking Age art, c. 1000, found in Kamen Pomorski, Poland. The original disappeared during World War II (Hamburg Archaeological Museum)

Bamberg Casket (or so-called Casket of St Kunigunde), c. 1000, oak with mammoth? Ivory, 13.3 x 25.7 cm (from St. Stephans in Bamberg, now in the Bavarian National Museum, Munich)

Bamberg Casket (or so-called Casket of St Kunigunde), c. 1000, oak with mammoth ivory, 13.3 x 25.7 cm (from St. Stephans in Bamberg, now in the Bavarian National Museum, Munich)

Three particularly fine examples of the Mammen style survived into the modern era: the Cammin casket found in Kamen Pomorski, Poland, the Bamberg casket of southern Germany (now located in Munich), and the León reliquary of Spain, which is the only known Viking object to be found on the Iberian Peninsula. These three examples demonstrate how Mammen-style objects have been found in many regions, attesting yet again to the far reach of Norse visual culture.

Heggen weathervane

Heggen weathervane (left) and drawing of the designs which include the Great Beast (right) (Kulturhistorisk museum, UiO, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Ringerike style

The Mammen style was short-lived, but the subsequent style—called Ringerike—was energized by its ingenuity. Continuing to use the double contour lines and spiral hip joints seen previously, Ringerike ornament is tightly composed. Bird motifs become more common and the Great Beast appears in full force, but neither feature the beaded ornamentation of Jellinge and Mammen creatures.

The adoption of European influences into Norse artistic conventions are visible in the Ringerike style. Diverse uses of foliates and tendrils, for example, are features that were taken from Frankish and British influences and modified to suit Norse sensibilities. Appearing in clusters of varying thicknesses, tendrils grow outward from animal bodies. This can be seen on several weathervanes (such as the Heggen weathervane), which were customarily gilded, fixed to the prows of ships, and later, repositioned on the roofs of churches. Their borders feature friezes of vegetal motifs, and on their plates are beasts—including birds and the Great Beast—tangled within foliates.

Stone from sarcophagus at St. Paul’s churchyard, London

Stone from sarcophagus at St. Paul’s churchyard, London (photo: David Beard MA)

New variations on the Great Beast appear in the Ringerike style. The Great Beast may be shown with other Great Beasts, with multiple snakes, or with monsters we cannot always identify. A carved stone slab that was found at St. Paul’s churchyard in London, for instance, shows the Great Beast with long tendrils that curl at the far end (a variation of the lappets seen in the earlier Jellinge style) forming tendril-like horns and tongue. It also has spiral hip joints. Its body is entwined with a serpent and another, smaller creature wraps around its forelimb. The carved stone slab comes from the end of a box-tomb. The runic inscription carved into its side suggests that the carver was Swedish.

Even more common are runestones that only feature inscriptions. For example, Runestone Sö 130 from Södermanland County, Sweden, has only bands of runic text. These commemorate a man who died in what would be modern-day Russia.

Ringerike-style runestones that only feature inscriptions were common. For example, Runestone Sö 130 from Södermanland County, Sweden, has only bands of runic text. These commemorate a man who died in what would be modern-day Russia (photo: Berig, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Due to the growing popularity of Christianity, funerary customs shift and there are fewer grave goods in the Ringerike style. Architecture, weapons, and ivory carvings become the more prevalent remains, and runestones—although less detailed than the greater stone raised at Jelling—become more common.

The Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Micha L. Rieser)

The Great Beast motif is in blue, a snake-like creature is in green, and a ribbon is in red. The Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Micha L. Rieser)

Urnes style

In the last phase of Viking Age art, the Urnes style, there is a turn to elegant, schematic forms. Animals are portrayed with tapered anatomical features and in regal stances.

The Urnes style has three primary motifs: a standing, four-legged animal resembling the Great Beast; a snake-like creature but with a single foreleg and/or hind leg; and a thin ribbon. Perhaps associated with the growth of Christianity, there was an increased esteem for this style across mainland Scandinavia. Surviving examples of it can be seen on architecture and runestones, each of which could use pagan and Christian iconography simultaneously.

Left: the Urnes Stave Church; right: the Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Bjørn Erik Pedersen, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Left: the Urnes Stave Church with a view toward the north portal (photo: Evelina Ander, CC BY-NC 2.0); right: detail from the Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Bjørn Erik Pedersen, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Although its origins are likely Swedish, this style is associated with a stave church in the Norwegian village of Urnes. Its relief carvings, which fully embody the style’s characteristics, have been the subject of art-historical interpretation for some time. Their rhythmic compositions have elegant swooping, symmetrical, and interlace designs, and the background is more clearly visible.

The Urnes Stave Church Portal, c. 1132

The Urnes Stave Church north portal, c. 1132, wood, Ornes, Norway (photo: Micha L. Rieser)

Although the use of spiral hip joints persist, the proportions of creatures’ bodies curve and swell in a fashion that differentiates them from previous styles. Eyes are enlarged, nearly filling the heads, and lower jaws are given hook-like extensions. The feet of the Great Beast standing next to the door gracefully end in wisps that rest between delicate vegetal motifs. Although the structure is Christian in function, these decorative forms remain indebted to pre-Christian styles.

The Pitney disc-brooch, The British Museum; The Bell Shrine of St. Patrick, National Museum of Ireland

The Pitney disc-brooch, late 11th century, Urnes style, copper alloy and gold, found in Pitney, England (© The Trustees of the British Museum); The Bell Shrine of St. Patrick, c. 1100, bronze, silver-gilt frame, 30 gold filigree panels (some now missing), rock crystal (National Museum of Ireland; photo: Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank)

As the Norsemen traveled, traded, and settled across new regions, this style’s influences were carried with them. Urnes-styled objects appear in the Baltic, and examples such as the Pitney Brooch demonstrate a localized adaptation of it in England. In Ireland, the Norse re-occupation of Dublin fueled artistic interest in the Urnes style, with metal and stone objects exhibiting its features. When looking at gold filigree ornamenting the bell shrine of St. Patrick, for example, precisely-crafted patterns demonstrate interest in geometry and rhythmic compositions. The style’s acceptance there, however, came just as it was dying in Scandinavia.

The Viking Age comes to an end

Prior to the 10th century, Scandinavian regions were considered peripheral to western Europe. It was from the 10th through the 13th centuries that the introduction of Christianity and the introduction of European-style monarchy eventually brought the Viking Age to a close. The Ringerike and Urnes styles described above flourished through this time, until the European Romanesque style was popularized, displacing pagan traditions.

There is much more to Norse art than style. While objects were made by skilled workers, they were also situated within a complex society whose endeavors affected a vast geographic expanse. Those discussed here provide only a small window into the Viking Age.

 

Cite this page as: Dr. Andrea C. Snow, “Art of the Viking Age,” in Smarthistory, October 1, 2020, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/viking-art/.

Urnes Stave Church

The wooden church of Urnes (the stavkirke) stands in the natural setting of Sogn og Fjordane. It was built in the 12th and 13th centuries and is an outstanding example of traditional Scandinavian wooden architecture. It brings together traces of Celtic art, Viking traditions, and Romanesque spatial structures.

Cite this page as: UNESCO, “Urnes Stave Church,” in Smarthistory, May 27, 2021, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/urnes-stave-church/.

 

The Anglo-Saxons

Decoding Anglo-Saxon art

Silver-gilt square-headed brooch from Grave 22, Chessell Down, Isle of Wight. Early Anglo-Saxon, early 6th century AD

Silver-gilt square-headed brooch from Grave 22, early 6th century, Chessell Down, Early Anglo-Saxon, Isle of Wight © Trustees of the British Museum

One of the most enjoyable things about working with the British Museum’s Anglo-Saxon collection is having the opportunity to study the intricate designs of the many brooches, buckles, and other pieces of decorative metalwork. This is because in Anglo-Saxon art there is always more than meets the eye.

A love of riddles

The objects invite careful contemplation, and you can find yourself spending hours puzzling over their designs, finding new beasts and images. The dense animal patterns that cover many Anglo-Saxon objects are not just pretty decoration; they have multi-layered symbolic meanings and tell stories. Anglo-Saxons, who had a love of riddles and puzzles of all kinds, would have been able to ‘read’ the stories embedded in the decoration. But for us it is trickier as we are not fluent in the language of Anglo-Saxon art.

Style I

Anglo-Saxon art went through many changes between the 5th and 11th centuries, but puzzles and story-telling remained central. The early art style of the Anglo-Saxon period is known as Style I and was popular in the late 5th and 6th centuries. It is characterized by what seems to be a dizzying jumble of animal limbs and face masks, which has led some scholars to describe the style as an “animal salad.” Close scrutiny shows that Style I is not as abstract as first appears, and through carefully following the decoration in stages we can unpick the details and begin to get a sense for what the design might mean.

Decoding the square-headed brooch (top) © Trustees of the British Museum

Decoding the square-headed brooch (top) © Trustees of the British Museum

One of the most exquisite examples of Style I animal art is a silver-gilt square-headed brooch from a female grave on the Isle of Wight. Its surface is covered with at least 24 different beasts: a mix of birds’ heads, human masks, animals and hybrids. Some of them are quite clear, like the faces in the circular lobes projecting from the bottom of the brooch. Others are harder to spot, such as the faces in profile that only emerge when the brooch is turned upside-down. Some of the images can be read in multiple ways, and this ambiguity is central to Style I art.

 

Decoding the square-headed brooch (bottom) © Trustees of the British Museum

Decoding the square-headed brooch (bottom) © Trustees of the British Museum

Once we have identified the creatures on the brooch, we can begin to decode its meaning. In the lozenge-shaped field at the foot of the brooch is a bearded face with a helmet underneath two birds that may represent the Germanic god Woden/Odin with his two companion ravens. The image of a god alongside other powerful animals may have offered symbolic protection to the wearer like a talisman or amulet.

 

DecodingTurning the brooch upside-down (above) reveals four heads in profile on the rectangular head of the brooch, highlighted in purple.

Decoding the great gold buckle from Sutton Hoo © Trustees of the British Museum

Decoding the great gold buckle from Sutton Hoo © Trustees of the British Museum

Style II

Style I was superseded by Style II in the late 6th century. This later style has more fluid and graceful animals, but these still writhe and interlace together and require patient untangling. The great gold buckle from Sutton Hoo is decorated in this style. From the thicket of interlace that fills the buckle’s surface 13 different animals emerge (above). These animals are easier to spot: the ring-and-dot eyes, the birds’ hooked beaks, and the four-toed feet of the animals are good starting points. At the tip of the buckle, two animals grip a small dog-like creature in their jaws and on the circular plate, two snakes intertwine and bite their own bodies. Such designs reveal the importance of the natural world, and it is likely that different animals were thought to hold different properties and characteristics that could be transferred to the objects they decorated. The fearsome snakes, with their shape-shifting qualities, demand respect and confer authority, and were suitable symbols for a buckle that adorned a high-status man, or even an Anglo-Saxon king.

The five senses on the Fuller Brooch © Trustees of the British Museum

The five senses on the Fuller Brooch © Trustees of the British Museum

Further transformations

Animal art continued to be popular on Anglo-Saxon metalwork throughout the later period, when it went through further transformations into the Mercian Style (defined by sinuous animal interlace) in the 8th century and then into the lively Trewhiddle Style in the 9th century. Trewhiddle-style animals feature in the roundels of the Fuller Brooch (above), but all other aspects of its decoration are unique within Anglo-Saxon art. Again, through a careful unpicking of its complex imagery we can understand its visual messages. At the centre is a man with staring eyes holding two plants. Around him are four other men striking poses: one, with his hands behind his back, sniffs a leaf; another rubs his two hands together; the third holds his hand up to his ear; and the final one has his whole hand inserted into his mouth. Together these strange poses form the earliest personification of the five senses: Sight, Smell, Touch, Hearing, and Taste. Surrounding these central motifs are roundels depicting animals, humans, and plants that perhaps represent God’s Creation.

Sight and wisdom

This iconography can best be understood in the context of the scholarly writings of King Alfred the Great (died 899), which emphasized sight and the “mind’s eye” as the principal way in which wisdom was acquired along with the other senses. Given this connection, perhaps it was made at Alfred the Great’s court workshop and designed to be worn by one of his courtiers?

Throughout the period, the Anglo-Saxons expressed a love of riddles and puzzles in their metalwork. Behind the non-reflective glass in the newly opened Sir Paul and Lady Ruddock Gallery of Sutton Hoo and Europe 300-1100, you can do like the Anglo-Saxons and get up close to these and many other objects to decode the messages yourself.

Rosie Weetch, curator and Craig Williams, illustrator, British Museum

Originally published on The British Museum Blog

© Trustees of the British Museum

Cite this page as: The British Museum, “Decoding Anglo-Saxon art,” in Smarthistory, February 28, 2017, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/decoding-anglo-saxon-art/.

England

Anglo-Saxon England

Ship's figure-head, late 4th century - 5th century, oak, 149 cm, (Germanic?/Roman? found in Belgium)© The Trustees of the British Museum

Ship’s figure-head, late 4th – 5th century, oak, 149 cm, (Germanic?/Roman? found Belgium) © The Trustees of the British Museum

In the fifth century C.E., people from tribes called Angles, Saxons, and Jutes left their homelands in northern Europe to look for a new home. They knew that the Romans had recently left the green land of Britain unguarded, so they sailed across the channel in small wooden boats. This warlike dragon figurehead is from a ship of that time.

The Britons did not give in without a fight, but after many years the invaders managed to overcome them, driving them to the west of the country. The Anglo-Saxons were to rule for over 500 years.

Some objects were left behind by the Anglo-Saxons which have given us clues about how they lived. The British Museum is home to the largest and finest Anglo-Saxon collection in the world.

Æthelwulf Ring, c. 828-58, niello, gold, 2.8 cm diameter, England, © Trustees of the British Museum

Left: Æthelwulf Ring, c. 828-58 C.E., niello, gold, 2.8 cm diameter, and right: Æthelswith Ring, c. 853-74 C.E., niello, gold, 2.6 cm in diameter, both England © Trustees of the British Museum

 

Map of Anglo-Saxon England

Map of Anglo-Saxon England

Anglo-Saxon England was divided into the five main kingdoms of Wessex, East Anglia, Mercia, Northumbria and Kent, each with its own king. Kings often died early and violent deaths. As well as fighting against each other for power, they had to keep their own nobles happy, or they might rise up against them. One way that they did this was to give them expensive presents.

The ring on the left was perhaps given to a noble by King Æthelwulf of Wessex. The other ring has AD on it which stands for “Agnus Dei” meaning “Lamb of God” in Latin. On the back the name Æthelswith has been cut. She was Æthelwulf’s daughter and the ring might have been a gift she gave to show her favour.

 

 

Æthelwulf Ring, c. 828-58, niello, gold, 2.8 cm diameter, England, © Trustees of the British Museum

Æthelwulf Ring, c. 828-58 C.E., niello, gold, 2.8 cm diameter, England © Trustees of the British Museum

© Trustees of the British Museum

Cite this page as: The British Museum, “Anglo-Saxon England,” in Smarthistory, February 28, 2017, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/anglo-saxon-england/.

Sutton Hoo

Sutton Hoo Ship Burial

The Sir Paul and Lady Ruddock Gallery, The British Museum

Sutton Hoo and Europe 300–1100 C.E., The Sir Paul and Lady Ruddock Gallery © The Trustees of the British Museum

The most famous Anglo-Saxon treasures in the Museum come from the Sutton Hoo burial site in Suffolk. Here mysterious grassy mounds covered a number of ancient graves. In one particular grave, belonging to an important Anglo-Saxon warrior, some astonishing objects were buried, but there is little in the grave to make it clear who was buried there.

Sutton Hoo

On a small hill above the river Deben in Suffolk is a strange-looking field, covered with grassy mounds of different sizes. For several hundred years what lay under them was a mystery.

Left: Painted portrait of Edith Pretty (© British Museum); Right: Basil Brown (photo: Suffolk Archaeological Unit)

Left: Painted portrait of Edith Pretty (© British Museum); Right: Basil Brown (photo: Suffolk Archaeological Unit)

In 1939 Mrs Edith Pretty, a landowner at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, asked archaeologist Basil Brown to investigate the largest of several Anglo-Saxon burial mounds on her property. Inside, he made one of the most spectacular archaeological discoveries of all time. Brown started digging under mounds 2, 3 and 4, where he found a few, mostly broken, Anglo-Saxon objects which had been buried alongside their owner’s bodies. Sadly, grave robbers had taken most of what was there. With a little more hope he started on the biggest mound, Mound 1. He did not know that the treasures under Mound 1 would turn out to be the most amazing set of Anglo-Saxon objects ever found.

Photo of the excavation of the Sutton Hoo ship burial, by Barbara Wagstaff, 1939. © 2019 The Trustees of the British Museum

Excavation of the Sutton Hoo ship burial, 1939 (photo: Barbara Wagstaff, © 2019 The Trustees of the British Museum)

Beneath the mound was the imprint of a 27-metre-long ship. At its centre was a ruined burial chamber packed with treasures: Byzantine silverware, sumptuous gold jewelry, a lavish feasting set, and most famously, an ornate iron helmet. Dating to the early 600s, this outstanding burial clearly commemorated a leading figure of East Anglia, the local Anglo-Saxon kingdom. It may even have belonged to a king.

Belt Buckle, Sutton Hoo, gold, 13.2 x 5.6 cm (The British Museum)

Belt Buckle, Sutton Hoo, early 7th century, gold, 13.2 x 5.6 cm © Trustees of the British Museum

Gold coins and ingots from the ship burial at Sutton Hoo, early 7th century, Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, England, © Trustees of the British Museum.

Gold coins and ingots from the ship burial at Sutton Hoo, early 7th century, Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, England © Trustees of the British Museum.

The burial can only be dated on the basis of the coins that were found there. There was a purse among the burial goods, which contained 37 gold coins, 3 coin-shaped blanks, and 2 small gold ingots. The presence of the coin-shaped blanks suggests that the number of coins was deliberately rounded up to 40. The coins cannot be dated closely, but seem to have been deposited at some point between around 610-635. They all come from the kingdom of the Merovingian Franks on the Continent, rather than any English kingdom, although coin production had started in Kent by this time. Sutton Hoo was in the kingdom of East Anglia and the coin dates suggest that it may be the burial of King Raedwald, who died around 625.

The Sutton Hoo ship burial provides remarkable insights into early Anglo-Saxon England. It reveals a place of exquisite craftsmanship and extensive international connections, spanning Europe and beyond. It also shows that the world of great halls, glittering treasures and formidable warriors described in Anglo-Saxon poetry was not a myth.

Mrs Edith Pretty donated the finds to the British Museum in 1939.

© Trustees of the British Museum

Cite this page as: The British Museum, “Sutton Hoo Ship Burial,” in Smarthistory, March 3, 2017, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/the-sutton-hoo-ship-burial/.

URL: https://youtu.be/TX3dgT1l0Rg

 

URL: https://youtu.be/HMKkMi_Wggg

 

Sutton Hoo Ship Burial (video)

The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial (early Anglo-Saxon) at The British Museum including: Buckles and assorted pieces, Sword belt, Helmet, Great Gold Buckle, Purse Lid, Shoulder-clasps, early 7th century, gold, millefiori, and garnet as well as Bowl and spoons (Byzantine), c. 500-650, Coins (Merovingian Frank), n.d., gold, Drinking-horns, early 7th century, and the Anastasius Platter (Byzantine), c. 491-518, silver. found in Suffolk, England.

 

Cite this page as: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Sutton Hoo Ship Burial (video),” in Smarthistory, December 18, 2015, accessed November 1, 2023.

The Sutton Hoo purse lid

Purse lid from the Sutton Hoo ship burial, early 7th century, gold, garnet and millefiori, 19 x 8.3 cm (excluding hinges) (British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Purse lid from the Sutton Hoo ship burial, early 7th century, gold, garnet and millefiori, 19 x 8.3 cm (excluding hinges) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Purse lid from the Sutton Hoo ship burial

Wealth, and its public display, was probably used to establish status in early Anglo-Saxon society much as it is today. The purse lid from Sutton Hoo is the richest of its kind yet found.

Sutton Hoo shoulder-clasps (Early Anglo-Saxon), late 6th–early 7th century, gold, millefiori, and garnet, 5.4 x 12.7 x .5 cm (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Sutton Hoo shoulder-clasps (Early Anglo-Saxon), late 6th–early 7th century, gold, millefiori, and garnet, 5.4 x 12.7 x .5 cm (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The lid was made to cover a leather pouch containing gold coins. It hung by three hinged straps from the waist belt, and was fastened by a gold buckle. The lid had totally decayed but was probably made of whalebone—a precious material in early Anglo-Saxon England. Seven gold, garnet cloisonné and millefiori glass plaques were set into it. These are made with a combination of very large garnets and small ones, deliberately used to pick out details of the imagery. This combination could link the purse-lid and the fine shoulder clasps, which were also found in the ship burial, to the workshop of a single master-craftsman. It is possible that he made the entire suite of gold and garnet fittings discovered in Mound 1 as a single commission.

Decorative plaques (detail), Purse lid from the Sutton Hoo ship burial, early 7th century, gold, garnet and millefiori, 19 x 8.3 cm (excluding hinges) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Decorative plaques (detail), Purse lid from the Sutton Hoo ship burial, early 7th century, gold, garnet and millefiori, 19 x 8.3 cm (excluding hinges) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The plaques include twinned images of a bird-of-prey swooping on a duck-like bird and a man standing heroically between two beasts. These images must have had deep significance for the Anglo-Saxons, but it is impossible for us to interpret them. The fierce creatures are perhaps a powerful evocation of strength and courage, qualities that a successful leader of men must possess. Strikingly similar images of a man between beasts are known from Scandinavia.

© Trustees of the British Museum

Cite this page as: The British Museum, “The Sutton Hoo purse lid,” in Smarthistory, March 3, 2017, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/the-sutton-hoo-purse-lid/.

The Sutton Hoo helmet

The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, iron and tinned copper alloy helmet, consisting of many pieces of iron, now built into a reconstruction, 31.8 x 21.5 cm (as restored) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, iron and tinned copper alloy helmet, consisting of many pieces of iron, now built into a reconstruction, 31.8 x 21.5 cm (as restored) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

This extraordinary helmet is very rare. Only four complete helmets are known from Anglo-Saxon England: at Sutton Hoo, Benty Grange, Wollaston and York.

Archaeologists discovered this helmet lying in the tomb. It was an amazing, rare find. It was also very unusual because it had a face-mask. Look at the nose, eyebrows and holes for the warrior’s eyes. Can you see a dragon with outstretched wings, made up by the two bushy eyebrows, nose and mustache?

A reconstruction

Replica of the helmet made by the Royal Armories (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Replica of the helmet made by the Royal Armories (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

When found, the magnificent helmet from the Anglo-Saxon grave at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, was in hundreds of pieces. The burial chamber had collapsed and reduced the helmet to a pile of fragments. Pieces of rusted iron were mixed up with pieces of tinned bronze, all so corroded as to be barely recognizable. By precisely locating the remaining fragments and assembling them as if in a three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle, conservators have reconstructed the helmet. A complete replica made by the Royal Armories shows how the original would have looked.<

Replica of the helmet made by the Royal Armories (detail) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Replica of the helmet made by the Royal Armories (detail) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

The helmet comprised an iron cap, neck guard, cheek pieces and face mask. Its form derives from Late Roman cavalry helmets. The helmet’s surfaces were covered with tinned copper alloy panels that gave it a bright, silvery appearance. Many of these panels were decorated with interlacing animal ornament (“Style II”) and heroic scenes of warriors. One scene shows two men wearing horned head-gear, holding swords and spears. The other shows a mounted warrior trampling a fallen enemy, who in turn stabs the horse. The rider carries a spear which is supported by a curious small figure, standing on the rump of his horse – perhaps a supernatural helper. Similar scenes were popular in the Germanic world at this time.

Face mask (detail), The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, iron and tinned copper alloy helmet, consisting of many pieces of iron, now built into a reconstruction, 31.8 x 21.5 cm (as restored) (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Face mask (detail), The Sutton Hoo helmet, early 7th century, (The British Museum) (photo: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

 

The face-mask is the helmet’s most remarkable feature. It works as a visual puzzle, with two possible “solutions.” The first is of a human face, comprising eye-sockets, eyebrows, mustache, mouth and a nose with two small holes so that the wearer could breathe. The copper alloy eyebrows are inlaid with silver wire and tiny garnets. Each ends in a gilded boar’s head – a symbol of strength and courage appropriate for a warrior. The second “solution” is of a bird or dragon flying upwards. Its tail is formed by the mustache, its body by the nose, and its wings by the eyebrows. Its head extends from between the wings, and lays nose-to-nose with another animal head at the end of a low iron crest that runs over the helmet’s cap.

An earlier restoration

First restoration, Restoring the Sutton Hoo helmet © Trustees of the British Museum

First restoration, Restoring the Sutton Hoo helmet © Trustees of the British Museum

The first restoration of the helmet (above) was completed by 1947, but continuing research showed it to be inaccurate and it was dismantled in 1968. The new restoration relied entirely on the evidence of the fragments themselves and not on preconceived ideas – the aim of all modern archaeological conservation. It took the conservator a year of painstaking study and experimentation with more than 500 fragments.

The pieces had to be identified and matched by their thickness, texture and traces of the design in the corrosion. As months passed, vital discoveries were made about the helmet’s structure. The cap size and shape were established by joining fragments from the top and one of the sides; a small riveted plate on one piece provided evidence for the attachment of the ear-flaps. The discovery of the position of a third dragon’s head completed the dramatic face mask.

A temporary support was made (a plaster dome covered with modeling clay) on which the fragments were held with long pins while they were joined. The missing areas were filled with jute textile, stiffened with adhesive and skimmed with plaster. These infills were colored brown to match the iron.

Though rusted now, the helmet would originally have been a bright silvery color. The tinned bronze panels, the gilding and the garnets would have given it original, the striking appearance we see in the reconstruction.

A precious survival, the Sutton Hoo helmet has become an icon of the early medieval period.

Sutton Hoo: Anglo-Saxon ship-burial on the Google Cultural Institute

Sutton Hoo at the British Museum

© Trustees of the British Museum

Source: The British Museum, “The Sutton Hoo helmet,” in Smarthistory, March 3, 2017, accessed November 7, 2024, https://smarthistory.org/the-sutton-hoo-helmet/.

Anglo Saxon Manuscripts

The Lindisfarne Gospels

The Lindisfarne Gospels, c. 700 (Northumbria), 340 x 250 mm (British Library, Cotton MS Nero D IV) © 2019 British Library, used by permission Speakers: Dr. Kathleen Doyle, Lead Curator, Illuminated manuscripts, British Library and Dr. Steven Zucker. URL:  https://youtu.be/TYds0dsratI?si=yn8kYM8oXIFsXSqi 

A medieval monk takes up a quill pen, fashioned from a goose feather, and dips it into a rich, black ink made from soot. Seated on a wooden chair in the scriptorium of Lindisfarne, an island off the coast of Northumberland in England, he stares hard at the words from a manuscript made in Italy. This book is his exemplar, the codex (a bound book, made from sheets of paper or parchment) from which he is to copy the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

Lindisfarne Gospels, St. Matthew (detail), Second Initial Page, f.29, early 8th century (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St. Matthew (detail), Second Initial Page, f.29, early 8th century (British Library)

For about the next six years, he will copy this Latin. He will illuminate the gospel text with a weave of fantastic images— snakes that twist themselves into knots or birds, their curvaceous and overlapping forms creating the illusion of a third dimension into which a viewer can lose him or herself in meditative contemplation.

Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)

Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)

The book is a spectacular example of Insular or Hiberno-Saxon art—works produced in the British Isles between 500–900 C.E., a time of devastating invasions and political upheavals. Monks read from it during rituals at their Lindisfarne Priory on Holy Island, a Christian community that safeguarded the shrine of St Cuthbert, a bishop who died in 687 and whose relics were thought to have curative and miracle-working powers.

A Northumbrian monk, very likely the bishop Eadfrith, illuminated the codex in the early 8th century. Two-hundred and fifty-nine written and recorded leaves include full-page portraits of each evangelist; highly ornamental “cross-carpet” pages, each of which features a large cross set against a background of ordered and yet teeming ornamentation; and the Gospels themselves, each introduced by an historiated initial. The codex also includes sixteen pages of canon tables set in arcades. Here correlating passages from each evangelist are set side-by-side, enabling a reader to compare narrations.

In 635 C.E. Christian monks from the Scottish island of Iona built a priory in Lindisfarne. More than a hundred and fifty years later, in 793, Vikings from the north attacked and pillaged the monastery, but survivors managed to transport the Gospels safely to Durham, a town on the Northumbrian coast about 75 miles west of its original location.

We glean this information from the manuscript itself, thanks to Aldred, a 10th-century priest from a priory at Durham. Aldred’s colophon—an inscription that relays information about the book’s production—informs us that Eadfrith, a bishop of Lindisfarne in 698 who died in 721, created the manuscript to honor God and St. Cuthbert. Aldred also inscribed a vernacular translation between the lines of the Latin text, creating the earliest known Gospels written in a form of English.

Lindisfarne Gospels, St Matthew, Cross-Carpet page, f.26v (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Matthew, Cross-Carpet page, f.26v (British Library)

Matthew’s cross-carpet page exemplifies Eadfrith’s exuberance and genius. A mesmerizing series of repetitive knots and spirals is dominated by a centrally located cross. One can imagine devout monks losing themselves in the swirls and eddies of color during meditative contemplation of its patterns.

Compositionally, Eadfrith stacked wine-glass shapes horizontally and vertically against his intricate weave of knots. On closer inspection many of these knots reveal themselves as snake-like creatures curling in and around tubular forms, mouths clamping down on their bodies. Chameleon-like, their bodies change colors: sapphire blue here, verdigris green there, and sandy gold in between. The sanctity of the cross, outlined in red with arms outstretched and pressing against the page edges, stabilizes the background’s gyrating activity and turns the repetitive energy into a meditative force.

 

Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)

Likewise, Luke’s incipit (incipit: it begins) page teems with animal life, spiraled forms, and swirling vortexes. In many cases Eadfrith’s characteristic knots reveal themselves as snakes that move stealthily along the confines of a letter’s boundaries.

Blue pin-wheeled shapes rotate in repetitive circles, caught in the vortex of a large Q that forms Luke’s opening sentence—Quoniam quidem multi conati sunt ordinare narrationem. (Translation: As many have taken it in hand to set forth in order.)

Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)

Birds also abound. One knot enclosed in a tall rectangle on the far right unravels into a blue heron’s chest shaped like a large comma. Eadfrith repeats this shape vertically down the column, cleverly twisting the comma into a cat’s forepaw at the bottom. The feline, who has just consumed the eight birds that stretch vertically up from its head, presses off this appendage acrobatically to turn its body 90 degrees; it ends up staring at the words RENARRATIONEM (part of the phrase -re narrationem).

Eadfrith also has added a host of tiny red dots that envelop words, except when they don’t—the letters “NIAM” of “quoniam” are composed of the vellum itself, the negative space now asserting itself as four letters.

Lindesfarne Gospels, St. Luke, portrait page (137v) (British Library)
Lindesfarne Gospels, St. Luke, portrait page (137v) (British Library)

Luke’s incipit page is in marked contrast to his straightforward portrait page. Here Eadfrith seats the curly-haired, bearded evangelist on a red-cushioned stool against an unornamented background. Luke holds a quill in his right hand, poised to write words on a scroll unfurling from his lap. His feet hover above a tray supported by red legs. He wears a purple robe streaked with red, one that we can easily imagine on a late fourth or fifth century Roman philosopher. The gold halo behind Luke’s head indicates his divinity. Above his halo flies a blue-winged calf, its two eyes turned toward the viewer with its body in profile. The bovine clasps a green parallelogram between two forelegs, a reference to the Gospel.

According to the historian Bede from the nearby monastery in Monkwearmouth (d. 735), this calf, or ox, symbolizes Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. Bede assigns symbols for the other three evangelists as well, which Eadfrith duly includes in their respective portraits: Matthew’s is a man, suggesting the human aspect of Christ; Mark’s the lion, symbolizing the triumphant and divine Christ of the Resurrection; and John’s the eagle, referring to Christ’s second coming.

Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)

Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)

A dense interplay of stacked birds teem underneath the crosses of the carpet page that opens John’s Gospel. One bird, situated in the upper left-hand quadrant, has blue-and-pink stripes in contrast to others that sport registers of feathers. Stripes had a negative association to the medieval mind, appearing chaotic and disordered. The insane wore stripes, as did prostitutes, criminals, jugglers, sorcerers, and hangmen. Might Eadfrith be warning his viewers that evil lurks hidden in the most unlikely of places? Or was Eadfrith himself practicing humility in avoiding perfection?

All in all, the variety and splendor of the Lindisfarne Gospels are such that even in reproduction, its images astound. Artistic expression and inspired execution make this codex a high point of early medieval art.

Additional resources:

Sacred Texts: the Lindisfarne Gospels at the British Library

Lindisfarne Gospels: an Introduction from the British Library

Lindisfarne Gospels (BBC)

Under the microscope with the Lindisfarne Gospels (British Library Collection Care blog)

Cite this page as: Dr. Kathleen Doyle, The British Library and Louisa Woodville, “The Lindisfarne Gospels,” in Smarthistory, August 8, 2015, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/the-lindisfarne-gospels/.

Codex Amiatinus, the oldest complete Latin Bible

Codex Amiatinus, before 716, Wearmouth-Jarrow, c. 505 x 340 mm (Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence, MS Amiatino 1) Speakers: Dr. Claire Breay, Head of Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts and Dr. Beth Harris. URL:

Additional resources:
This manuscript in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana
This manuscript in the British Library’s Anglo-Saxons Kingdoms exhibition
The Codex Amiatinus and the St Cuthbert Gospel, British Library essay

 

Cite this page as: Dr. Claire Breay, The British Library and Dr. Beth Harris, “Codex Amiatinus, the oldest complete Latin Bible,” in Smarthistory, February 8, 2019, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/codex-amiatinus/.  URL: https://youtu.be/0P1m1afVfFI?si=kdTlBOdmLkGKEMLY

IRELAND

Skellig Michael

Skellig Michael monastery (Ireland), 6th–13th centuries (most of the stone construction dates to 8th–11th centuries)

Note: Skellig Michael has become famous more recently because of its appearance in Star Wars movies.

Additional resources

Skellig Michael on UNESCO’s World Heritage list

Cite this page as: Dr. Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Skellig Michael,” in Smarthistory, July 20, 2022, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/skellig-michael/.
URL:  https://youtu.be/P2s4stbS5a4?si=9V8bWx-IWUQbjL9G

The Book of Kells

The Book of Kells, c. 800, 340 vellum folios, 33.0 x 25.5 cm each (edges trimmed and gilded in the 19th century), MS 58 (Trinity College Library, Dublin). A conversation between Dr. Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank and Dr. Steven Zucker.  URL: https://youtu.be/QWxIE-SwxQo?si=3krcb72eKyhe2BlK

Additional resources

See the entire Book of Kells online at Trinity College, Dublin

Resources about The Book of Kells at Trinity College, Dublin

Read about the hidden meanings behind the illustrations in the Book of Kells. 

Read more about books in medieval Europe

Cite this page as: Dr. Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank and Dr. Steven Zucker, “The Book of Kells,” in Smarthistory, June 25, 2022, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/the-astonishing-book-of-kells/.

Muiredach Cross


Muiredach Master, Muiredach Cross, c. 923 C.E., sandstone, 18 feet high, Monasterboice (Mainistir Bhuithe), County Louth, Ireland.  URL: https://youtu.be/bATayLNuHpE?si=7iU3O73p9XvA9FeV

Cite this page as: Dr. Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Muiredach Cross,” in Smarthistory, September 30, 2022, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/muiredach-cross/.

Carolingian Period

Carolingian art, an introduction

Map of Europe at the time of Charlemagne

Map of Europe at the time of Charlemagne

Charlemagne, King of the Franks and later Holy Roman Emperor, instigated a cultural revival known as the Carolingian Renaissance. This revival used Constantine’s Christian empire as its model, which flourished between 306 and 337. Constantine was the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity and left behind an impressive legacy of military strength and artistic patronage.

Charlemagne saw himself as the new Constantine and instigated this revival by writing his Admonitio generalis (789) and Epistola de litteris colendis (c.794–797). In the Admonitio generalis, Charlemagne legislates church reform, which he believes will make his subjects more moral and in the Epistola de litteris colendis, a letter to Abbot Baugulf of Fulda, he outlines his intentions for cultural reform. Most importantly, he invited the greatest scholars from all over Europe to come to court and give advice for his renewal of politics, church, art and literature.

Odo of Metz, Palatine Chapel Interior, Aachen, 805 (photo: byzantologist, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Odo of Metz, Palatine Chapel Interior, Aachen, 805 (photo: byzantologist, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Carolingian art survives in manuscripts, sculpture, architecture and other religious artifacts produced during the period 780–900. These artists worked exclusively for the emperor, members of his court, and the bishops and abbots associated with the court. Geographically, the revival extended through present-day France, Switzerland, Germany and Austria.

Charlemagne commissioned the architect Odo of Metz to construct a palace and chapel in Aachen, Germany. The chapel was consecrated in 805 and is known as the Palatine Chapel. This space served as the seat of Charlemagne’s power and still houses his throne today.

The Palatine Chapel is octagonal with a dome, recalling the shape of San Vitale in Ravenna, Italy (completed in 548), but was built with barrel and groin vaults, which are distinctively late Roman methods of construction. The chapel is perhaps the best surviving example of Carolingian architecture and probably influenced the design of later European palace chapels.

Charlemagne had his own scriptorium, or center for copying and illuminating manuscripts, at Aachen. Under the direction of Alcuin of York, this scriptorium produced a new script known as Carolingian miniscule. Prior to this development, writing styles or scripts in Europe were localized and difficult to read. A book written in one part of Europe could not be easily read in another, even when the scribe and reader were both fluent in Latin. Knowledge of Carolingian miniscule spread from Aachen was universally adopted, allowing for clearer written communication within Charlemagne’s empire. Carolingian miniscule was the most widely used script in Europe for about 400 years.

Figurative art from this period is easy to recognize. Unlike the flat, two-dimensional work of Early Christian and Early Byzantine artists, Carolingian artists sought to restore the third dimension. They used classical drawings as their models and tried to create more convincing illusions of space.

St. Mark from the Godescalc Gospel Lectionary, folio 1v., c. 781–83 (Bibliothèque nationale de France)

St. Mark from the Godescalc Gospel Lectionary, folio 1v., c. 781–83 (Bibliothèque nationale de France)

This development is evident in tracing author portraits in illuminated manuscripts. The Godescalc Gospel Lectionary, commissioned by Charlemagne and his wife Hildegard, was made circa 781–83 during his reign as King of the Franks and before the beginning of the Carolingian Renaissance. In the portrait of St. Mark, the artist employs typical Early Byzantine artistic conventions. The face is heavily modeled in brown, the drapery folds fall in stylized patterns and there is little or no shading. The seated position of the evangelist would be difficult to reproduce in real life, as there are spatial inconsistencies. The left leg is shown in profile and the other leg is show straight on. This author portrait is typical of its time.

The Ebbo Gospels were made c. 816–35 in the Benedictine Abbey of Hautvillers for Ebbo, Archbishop of Rheims. The author portrait of St. Mark is characteristic of Carolingian art and the Carolingian Renaissance. The artist used distinctive frenzied lines to create the illusion of the evangelist’s body shape and position. The footstool sits at an awkward unrealistic angle, but there are numerous attempts by the artist to show the body as a three-dimensional object in space. The right leg is tucked under the chair and the artist tries to show his viewer, through the use of curved lines and shading, that the leg has form. There is shading and consistency of perspective. The evangelist sitting on the chair strikes a believable pose.

St. Mark from the Ebbo Gospels, folio 60v., c. 816–35 (Bibliothèque Nationale de France)

St. Mark from the Ebbo Gospels, folio 60v., c. 816–35 (Bibliothèque Nationale de France)

Charlemagne, like Constantine before him, left behind an almost mythic legacy. The Carolingian Renaissance marked the last great effort to revive classical culture before the Late Middle Ages. Charlemagne’s empire was led by his successors until the late ninth century. In early tenth century, the Ottonians rose to power and espoused different artistic ideals.

Additional resources: 

Carolingian Art on the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History

A Carolingian Masterpiece: the Moutier-Grandval Bible from the British Library

Cite this page as: Dr. Nancy Ross, “Carolingian art, an introduction,”

Charlemagne (part 1 of 2): An introduction

A brief overview of Charlemagne and his coronation in 800.

Cite this page as: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Charlemagne (part 1 of 2): An introduction,” in Smarthistory, July 5, 2018, accessed November 6, 2023, URL: https://youtu.be/j4PI8dEWTGE

Charlemagne (part 2 of 2): The Carolingian revival

A brief introduction to Charlemagne’s military campaigns and the cultural revival that he supported.

Cite this page as: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Charlemagne (part 2 of 2): The Carolingian revival,” in Smarthistory, July 4, 2018, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/charlemagne-part-2-of-2/.

Palatine Chapel, Aachen

The octagonal plan references earlier churches and symbolizes regeneration. Was Charlemagne’s throne at its center?

Palatine Chapel (Aix-la-Chapelle), Aachen, begun c. 792, consecrated 805 (thought to have been designed by Odo of Metz), significant changes to the architectural fabric 14–17th centuries (Gothic apse, c. 1355; dome rebuilt and raised in the 17th century, etc.), mosaics and revetment from the 19th century, columns looted by French troops in the 18th century though many were later returned, added back without knowledge as to their original locations in the 19th century. The structure was heavily damaged by allied bombing during WWII and significantly restored again in the second half of the twentieth century. With special thanks to Dr. Jenny H. Shaffer. Speakers: Dr. Steven Zucker and Dr. Beth Harris   URL: https://youtu.be/MfkNbXpDQ74

Carolingian art and the classical revival

The Palatine Chapel at Aachen is the most well-known and best-preserved Carolingian building. It is also an excellent example of the classical revival style that characterized the architecture of Charlemagne’s reign. The exact dates of the chapel’s construction are unclear, but we do know that this palace chapel was dedicated to Christ and the Virgin Mary by Pope Leo III in a ceremony in 805, five years after Leo promoted Charlemagne from king to Holy Roman Emperor. The dedication took place about twenty years after Charlemagne moved the capital of the Frankish kingdom from Ravenna, in what is now Italy, to Aachen, in what is now Germany.

Map with present-day nations (underlying map © Google)

Map with present-day nations (underlying map © Google)

In the construction of his chapel, Charlemagne made several strategic choices that linked his building to the legacies of ancient Rome and the fourth-century emperor Constantine. The Emperor Constantine was important because he was the first Christian emperor of Rome. The location for the new building was selected because it was an historic Roman site with hot springs that were used for bathing. The materials used for the chapel also invoked Rome; among them were columns and marble stones that Pope Hadrian permitted Charlemagne to transfer from Rome and Ravenna to Aachen around the year 798. A relic of the cloak of St. Martin was installed in the church at its consecration—the choice of a fourth-century Roman soldier who had a vision of Jesus after sharing his cloak with a beggar was another way to reinforce the link of Charlemagne’s rule with Rome.

Floorplans of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem; Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna; and Palatine Chapel, Aachen

Floorplans of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem; Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna; and Palatine Chapel, Aachen

Two important models (the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem and San Vitale in Ravenna)

The chapel’s classical style also referenced its Roman imperial lineage, particularly in its imitation of two significant Christian buildings: the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem and San Vitale in Ravenna. The Holy Sepulchre’s building program was started in 325 C.E. by Constantine’s mother, Saint Helena, and completed in 335. The centralized plan and surrounding ambulatory and upper gallery is echoed in the plan of the Palatine Chapel. However, the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem is composed of two main buildings—in addition to the rotunda that covers the tomb is a similar structure over the traditionally-accepted location of the crucifixion. The Holy Sepulchre may also have been the inspiration for the lion-head knockers of the chapel’s bronze doors (below).

Door (detail), Palatine Chapel, Aachen (photo: Bojin, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Door (detail), Palatine Chapel, Aachen (photo: Bojin, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Because it didn’t receive extensive additions like the Holy Sepulchre, the San Vitale Chapel at Ravenna is probably the best comparison for what the Palatine Chapel would have looked like before its Gothic renovations. San Vitale is a small octagonal church, with a centralized plan and a two-story ambulatory (below).

View with Ambulatory, Gallery, Chancel, and Apse, San Vitale, Ravenna, begun in 526 or 527 under Ostrogothic rule, consecrated in 547 and completed 548, mosaics date between 546 and 556

San Vitale, Ravenna, begun in 526 under Ostrogothic rule, consecrated in 547, completed 548

The octagonal plan of the Palatine Chapel (see plans above) not only recalled that of its two most significant models, but also participated in the tradition of early Christian mausoleums and baptisteries, where the eight sides were understood to be symbolic of regeneration—referencing Christ’s resurrection eight days after Palm Sunday. Its original dome was also based on classical models and bore an apocalyptic mosaic program, consisting of the agnus dei, or Lamb of God (which is, symbolically, Jesus Christ), surrounded by the tetramorph (symbols of the four Gospel writers) and the twenty-four elders described in Revelation 4:4. The agnus dei image was later obstructed by the installation of a chandelier.

Palatine Chapel interior (photo: Velvet, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Palatine Chapel interior (photo: Velvet, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The octagonal centralized plan of the Palatine Chapel is unique among Carolingian chapels; this may have been because, unlike a longitudinal plan which created a sense of processional direction toward the apse and altar, a centralized plan did not place special emphasis on the altar (and therefore may not have been as effective liturgically for the purpose of a chapel). That said, it does seem to have established an association of Charlemagne with Christ; some scholars believe that Charlemagne’s marble throne (below) was originally located in the center of the octagon on the first floor, that is, directly below the image of the agnus dei, thereby creating a kind of visual link between the emperor and the Christ.

Charlemagne's throne, Palatine Chapel, Aachen (photo: Berthold Werner, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Charlemagne’s throne, Palatine Chapel, Aachen (photo: Berthold Werner, CC BY-SA 3.0)

By presenting his capital at Aachen as a new Rome and himself as a new Constantine through the careful appropriation of late antique artwork and architecture, Charlemagne was not simply making a positive assertion about himself as ruler; he was also implicitly contrasting his reign with that of the Eastern Empire (the Byzantines), a negative stance that was also expressed around the same time in the Opus Caroli Regis contra Synodum (i.e., “The Work of King Charles against the Synod), a detailed response to the Second Council of Nicaea, written on his behalf by Theodulf of Orléans.

Europe before 774 (underlying map © Google)

Europe before 774 (underlying map © Google)

 

Palatine Chapel exterior, Aachen, consecrated 805, Carolingian structure visible (lower two stories) (photo: CaS2000, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Palatine Chapel exterior, Aachen, consecrated 805, Carolingian structure visible (lower two stories) (photo: CaS2000, CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Charlemagne’s body was interred in the Palatine Chapel after his death in 814. The building would continue to be used for coronation ceremonies for another 700 years—well into the sixteenth century.

Major additions to the chapel began in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, significantly changing the building’s profile and footprint with exterior chapels. After several fires in the seventeenth century, the dome was rebuilt and heightened.

Palatine Chapel on Google Maps

Additional resources

Carolingian Art on The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History

Jenny H. Shaffer, “Restoring Charlemagne’s chapel: historical consciousness, material culture, and transforming images of Aachen in the 1840s,” Journal of Art Historiography,  number 7 (December 2012).

Cite this page as: Dr. Jennifer Awes Freeman, “Palatine Chapel, Aachen,” in Smarthistory, June 11, 2023, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/palatine-chapel-aachen/.

The Utrecht Psalter and its influence

 

The Utrecht Psalter, c. 825, Hautvilliers, near Reims, France, 380 x 310 mm (Universiteitsbibliotheek, Utrecht, MS 32, ff. 7v–8r), courtesy Universiteitsbibliothek, Utrecht; The Harley Psalter, early 11th century, Christ Church, Canterbury, 380 x 310 mm (British Library, BL, Harley MS 603, ff. 7v 8r), © 2019 British Library, used by permission; and the The Eadwine Psalter, c. 1150, Christ Church, Canterbury, 460 x 330 mm (Cambridge, Trinity College, MS R. 17.1, ff. 23v–24r)

A conversation with Dr. Kathleen Doyle, Lead Curator, Illuminated Manuscripts, British Library and Dr. Beth Harris.  URL: https://youtu.be/h8hQIRmrEnM?si=sXB5LZye57s9-DBA

Additional resources:
This manuscript in the Utrecht University Library
This manuscript in the British Library’s Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms exhibition
The Harley Psalter at the British Library

 

Cite this page as: Dr. Kathleen Doyle, The British Library and Dr. Beth Harris, “The Utrecht Psalter and its influence,” in Smarthistory, February 8, 2019, accessed November 1, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/utrecht-psalter/.

 

Lindau Gospels cover

Jeweled upper cover of the Lindau Gospels, c. 880, Court School of Charles the Bald, 350 x 275 mm, cover may have been made in the Royal Abbey of St. Denis (Morgan Library and Museum, New York).   URL: https://youtu.be/u5vM4rtUSQg?si=FQMdmXap_8NhLWc7

Cite this page as: Dr. Nancy Ross and Dr. Steven Zucker, “Lindau Gospels cover,” in Smarthistory, December 10, 2015, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/lindau-gospels-cover/.

Ottonian Period

Otto I lends his name to the “Ottonian” period. The Ottonian kings were determined to define themselves as Roman Emperors in the style of Constantine and Charlemagne, c. 936–1015 C.E.

 

Ottonian Art, an introduction

by VICTORIA VALDES

Detail, Otto I presenting the Cathedral of Magdeburg, 962–968, Ottonian, from the Cathedral of Magdeburg, probably made in Milan, northern Italy (The Metropolitan Museum of Art). On this ivory, Otto presents a symbolic model of the church to Christ for his blessing. As a humble servant, Otto is depicted smaller than the company of patron saints.

Detail, Otto I presenting the Cathedral of Magdeburg, 962–968, Ottonian, from the Cathedral of Magdeburg, probably made in Milan, northern Italy (The Metropolitan Museum of Art). On this ivory, Otto presents a symbolic model of the church to Christ for his blessing. As a humble servant, Otto is depicted smaller than the company of patron saints.

Henry’s son Otto I (who became emperor in 962) lends his name to the “Ottonian” period. He forged an important alliance with the Pope, which allowed him to be crowned the first official Holy Roman Emperor since 924. This contact with Rome was extremely important to Ottonian artistic development, since each Ottonian king was determined to define himself as a Roman Emperor in the style of Constantine and Charlemagne. This meant perpetuating a highly intellectual court and creating an extensive artistic legacy.

Ottonian art takes a number of traditional medieval forms, including elegantly illuminated manuscripts, lavish metalwork, intricate carving, and Romanesque churches and cathedrals. Perhaps the most famous of the Ottonian artistic innovations is the Saxon Romanesque architecture style, which is marked by a careful attention to balance and mathematical harmony.  This focus on geometry is based on the texts de Arithmatica and Ars Geometriae by the 6th century philosopher Boethius. The Ottonians held mathematical sciences in high regard and this is reflected in many of their artistic productions.

The illuminated manuscripts produced by Ottonian “scriptoria,” or monastery painting and writing schools, provide documentation of both Ottonian religious and political customs and the stylistic preferences of the period.  Manuscripts were most often produced of religious texts, and usually included a dedication portrait commemorating the book’s creation.  The royal or religious donor is usually shown presenting the book to the saint of his or her choice.

Uta Codex (Uta Presents the Codex to Mary), c. 1020, Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm. 13601, folio 2, recto

Uta Codex (Uta Presents the Codex to Mary), c. 1020, Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm. 13601, f. 2, recto (digitized)

Here we see a powerful abbess, Uta, presenting her codex to St. Mary.  Many manuscripts also included a page depicting the artist or scribe of the work, acknowledging that the production of a book required not only money but also artistic labor.

Hillinus Codex (Hillinus Presents the Codex to St. Peter), c.1020, Cologne Dombibliothek, folio 16, verso, manuscript 12

Hillinus Codex (Hillinus Presents the Codex to St. Peter), c.1020, Cologne Dombibliothek, folio 16, verso, manuscript 12 (digitized)

In the Hillinus Codex, a monk presents the codex that he has written or painted (or both!) to St. Peter.  The work of the artist and scribe were often one and the same, as can be seen in many of the fantastic decorated initials that begin books or chapters in Ottonian Manuscripts.  As you can see from the dedication pictures, the manuscripts in question are often depicted as they were frequently displayed, that is with the text securely enclosed between lavish metal covers.

Ottonian metalwork took many forms, but one of the most common productions was bejeweled book covers for their precious manuscripts. This cover is one of the most expensive that survives; it includes not only numerous jewels, but an ivory carving of the death of the Virgin Mary.

Presentation of Christ, Bronze doors, 1015, commissioned by Bishop Bernward for Saint Michael's, Hildesheim (Germany) (photo: Holly Hayes, by permission)

Presentation of Christ, Bronze doors, 1015, commissioned by Bishop Bernward for Saint Michael’s, Hildesheim (Germany) (photo: Holly Hayes, by permission)

On a larger scale, clerics like Bernward of Hildesheim cast his 15-foot doors depicting the fall and redemption of mankind out of single pieces of bronze (see the video in this tutorial).  This was an enormous undertaking, and the process was so complex that it would not be replicated until the Renaissance.

For a modern viewer, Ottonian art can be a little difficult to understand.  The depictions of people and places don’t conform to a naturalistic style, and the symbolism is often obscure.  When you look at Ottonian art, keep in mind that the aim for these artists was not to create something that looked “realistic,” but rather to convey abstract concepts, many of which are deeply philosophical in nature.  The focus on symbolism can also be one of the most fascinating aspects of studying Ottonian art, since you can depend on each part of the compositions to mean something specific.  The more time you spend on each composition, the more rewarding discoveries emerge.

Additional resources:

Ottonian Art on The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History

Gospel Book from Bamberg Cathedral (Reichenau Gospel)

Cite this page as: Victoria Valdes, “Ottonian art, an introduction,” in Smarthistory, December 25, 2015, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/ottonian-art-an-introduction/.

Gospel Book of Otto III

Double page opening: Provinces Bringing Tribute (f.23v.) and Ruler Portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, each page 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

Double page opening: Provinces Bringing Tribute (f.23v.) and Ruler Portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, each page 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

The double page opening of the ruler portrait of Otto III and the accompanying image of provinces bringing tribute is taken from the Gospels of Otto III, one of the most magnificent manuscripts to have come down to us from the early medieval period. It is thought to have been made about the year 1000 at the Benedictine monastery of Reichenau on Lake Constance where Austria, Switzerland, and Germany converge and belongs to a group of stylistically related manuscripts from the monastery known as the Liuthar group. The monk Liuthar is represented in another gospel-book made for Otto III that is now in the cathedral treasury at Aachen (Aachen, Domschatzkammer, G25). Liuthar is now thought to have been a scribe rather than an artist but the scribe was usually the main co-ordinating figure for a manuscript project.

St. Luke, Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

Luke the Evangelist, Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

The pages of the Gospels of Otto III manuscript measure 334 by 242 millimeters and are made of parchment. The script is written in ink, with gold initials, and the manuscript is extensively illustrated with portraits of the four evangelists (the authors of the four gospels), and scenes from the life of Christ as well as the ruler portrait. The front cover is decorated with precious jewels and inset with a Byzantine ivory representing the dormition or death of the Virgin Mary. The double page is near the beginning of the manuscript before the gospel texts.

Front cover of the Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, each page 33.4 x 24.2 cm, ink, gold, paint, parchment (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich)

Front cover, Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, each page 33.4 x 24.2 cm, ink, gold, paint, parchment (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich)

We do not know the name of the artist (as is the case for most of the painters from this period), but he most likely belonged to a team of craftsmen working on the manuscript. In devising the double opening, he appears not to have worked from his imagination but to have followed an earlier source such as the ruler portrait of Charles the Bald in the ninth-century manuscript known as the Codex Aureus of Saint Emmeram (Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm.14000, f. 5 v.).

Ruler portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, Clm.4453 (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich)

Ruler portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, each page 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

On the right side of the double page, emperor Otto III is shown seated frontally, crowned, and holding a golden orb and a sceptre surmounted by an eagle. Otto III was the Holy Roman Emperor and nominally ruled over territories corresponding to modern-day Germany, France, and northern Italy. The title Holy Roman Emperor dates back to Charlemagne and like this earlier emperor, Otto III was crowned by the Pope in Rome where Otto III spent most of his reign. Otto III was Holy Roman Emperor from 996 to 1002, when he died at the age of 21.

Otto III looks out at us with hypnotic eyes, and is dressed in green and the imperial purple. He was the son of Otto II, who died when Otto III was three, and a Byzantine Princess called Theophanu, and we know that he was an educated man.

He is flanked on either side by members of his court: on the right by those who fight (two members of the nobility who carry a sword, a lance, and shield) and, on the left, by those who pray (two members of the clergy who hold books).

Provinces Bringing Tribute (f.23v.), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich)

Provinces Bringing Tribute (f.23v.), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

The pendant image depicts four personifications of the territories over which Otto ruled and who are shown bringing him tribute. They are identified as: Sclavinia (Slavic east), Germania (roughly Germany), Gallia (roughly France), and Roma (Rome). The device of the personification (whereby an abstract idea is represented by a human figure, usually a female one) goes back to classical art. There is a parallel between this scene and that of the adoration of the three magi (represented as crowned kings, a tenth-century innovation) bringing gifts to the infant Christ (represented on f.29 of the manuscript), which underlines the quasi-divine nature of the Emperor.

Ruler portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

Ruler portrait of Otto III (f.24), Gospels of Otto III, c. 1000, ink, gold, paint, parchment, 33.4 x 24.2 cm (Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich, Clm.4453)

This is not a portrait in the conventional sense of a likeness and gives us very little idea of what Otto III must have looked like. Otto III is represented out of proportion with the much smaller figures that flank him—indicating his status. The opening pages probably represent an ideal of Otto III’s rule rather than the reality of his situation as his rule was fraught with division. The style of the opening looks back to late antique illusionism (note, for example, the lozenge-shaped ornament in the borders, and the atmospheric backgrounds which recall, for example, such manuscripts as the Vatican Vergil made in about 400) but has an extraordinary flatness to it as if the scene has been pressed between two panes of glass.

This style is known as Ottonian, a period style concept that covers both the reigns of the three emperors bearing the name Otto and of their immediate successors through the late eleventh century. It both precedes and anticipates the Romanesque style.

After Otto’s death, the manuscript passed to his cousin and heir, Henry II, who gave it to the cathedral of Bamberg which he founded, where it remained until 1803, when during the secularization of the church, it was transferred to the Bavarian State Library. The manuscript is rarely exhibited, but a facsimile of it has been made.

Additional resources

This manuscript digitized at the Bayerische Stattsbibliothek, Munich

UNESCO: Monastic Island of Reichenau.

Ottonian Art on The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.

Cite this page as: Dr. Andreas Petzold, “Gospel Book of Otto III,” in Smarthistory, August 8, 2015, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/gospel-book-of-otto-iii/.

Cross of Lothair II

Large, colorful gems ornament this magnificent Ottonian cross, likely made for emperor Otto III.

Cross of Lothair II, c. 1000 (Ottonian), oak core, gold, silver, gems, pearls, Augustus spolia cameo, cloisonné enamel, 50 x 38.5 x 2.3 cm, base dates to the 14th century, dedicated by Otto III (Aachen Cathedral Treasury Germany). Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker.  URL: https://youtu.be/DDpWqsDqPCk?si=h4rvZHt2-0NAuzM1

Cite this page as: Dr. Steven Zucker and Dr. Beth Harris, “Cross of Lothair II,” in Smarthistory, August 3, 2023, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/cross-of-lothair-ii/.

Bronze doors, Saint Michael’s, Hildesheim (Germany)

Bronze doors, 1015, commissioned by Bishop Bernward for Saint Michael’s, Hildesheim (Germany)

Interior of St. Michael’s Hildesheim – view on Google Maps

URL: https://youtu.be/__pl88NO9Jw?si=BIdmKpreB6yM71Qn

Additional resources:

St Mary’s Cathedral and St Michael’s Church at Hildesheim from UNESCO

St. Michael’s church at Sacred Destinations

Medieval Treasures from Hildesheim (exhibition catalog from The Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Cite this page as: Dr. Nancy Ross and Dr. Jennifer Awes Freeman, “Bronze doors, Saint Michael’s, Hildesheim (Germany),” in Smarthistory, December 11, 2015, accessed November 6, 2023, https://smarthistory.org/bronze-doors-saint-michaels-hildesheim-germany/.

License

Share This Book